Sophisticated (A) 6 pts

Demonstration of knowledge of subject matter assigned

Final Paper Grading Rubric
Paper must be written in APA format. Please consult your APA manual for details. APA templates are available in Microsoft word. All information must be cited in APA format. The term paper is graded numerically with a maximum of 100 percentage points. In addition to the parameters of this rubric, points will be deducted for mistakes in APA formatting. Additionally, the source of all information must be cited in APA format. 1 point will be deducted for each missing citation. The template for the research proposal is available in the Moodle class documents at the top.

Organization/Development
The paper has structure that is clear, logical and easy to follow. Transitions between sentences, paragraphs and sections aid in maintaining the flow of thought. Paper includes introduction and conclusion and the discussion flows logically.
The paper has adequate structure and can be followed but there are some problems with appropriate transitions.
The paper has all of the basic structure and content but the flow of thought is difficult to follow through to the conclusion
The paper has statements that are non-sequitur. The content does not meet appropriate standards for this course
Mechanics
Paper is 1500-2000 words in length. The paper uses APA guidelines for format.
Citations of original works within the body of the paper follow APA format. Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed.
Sentences are complete, clear, concise and varied.
The paper has the required length with appropriate citations. There are some minor errors in APA formatting. There are some mistakes in punctuation, grammar and/or usage. Sentences contain some redundancies.
The paper length is close to the assigned criteria but not on the mark. There are obvious deficiencies in writing style not commensurate with a graduate level student, but there is hope.
The student did not follow directions for length. There are multiple mistakes in grammar and usage on every page. APA formatting was not followed.

Biostatistics Presentation Grading Rubric

Sophisticated (A) 10 pt
Visual Content
(25% of grade)
Exceptionally engaging visual presentation or activity.
Exceptionally clear and engaging style.

Concise and professional tone appropriate to target audience.
Moderately clear style.

Some effort to engage the audience.

Tone generally appropriate for target audience.

Rare lack of precision or conciseness.
Unclear communication.

Minimal effort to engage audience.
Citations and references used proper APA format.
Yoan Vigil
MSN-520
Instruction and Assessment Strategies
Thomas A. Sharon

Miami Regional University
August 10, 2016
Abstract
The abstract is a brief summary of the entire proposal, typically ranging from 150 to 250 words.
It is different from a thesis statement in that the abstract summarizes the entire proposal, not just
mentioning the study’s purpose or hypothesis. Therefore, the abstract should outline the proposal’s major headings: the research question, theoretical framework, research design, sampling method, instrumentation, and data and analysis procedures. A good abstract accurately reflects the content of the proposal, while at the same time being coherent, readable, and concise.
Do not add any information in the abstract that is not previously discussed throughout the
proposal. Notice this paragraph is not indented; the abstract will be the only paragraph in the
entire proposal that is not indented. Because it highlights the entire proposal, it would be wise to
wait and write the abstract last. This way, one merely has to reword information that was
previously written.

(No more than 500 word)

• Introduction (Problem) Include an explanation or definition of the problem with supporting evidence. (Cite the source). All the text should be 2 spaced. Cite your source. (Brown, 2010).
• Picot question
• Hypothesis
• Statistics Sample(allocation)
• Conclusion (prospective budget, )
1. PICOT Question:
Population: Bariatric adolescents considering or undergoing gastric bypass surgery.
Intervention: The nurse’s role as a primary member of the multidisciplinary team regarding perioperative care of the bariatric adolescent patient.
Comparison: The nurse’s role as a secondary member of the multidisciplinary team without any specialized training and is only involved in perioperative care of the bariatric adolescent patient.
Outcome: When the nurse is involved as one of the primary members in the multidisciplinary team approach, the bariatric adolescent patient has better continuity of care.
Time: perioperative including the 6 weeks post recovery.
PICOT Question: Does the bariatric adolescent patient undergoing gastric bypass have better continuity of care perioperatively and postoperatively when the nurse is a primary member of the multidisciplinary team versus when the nurse is a secondary member whose only role is in providing perioperative care and has no specialized training?
2. Intervention PICOT Question, an Intervention example:
In adult patients with total hip replacements (Patient population) how effective is PCA pain medication (Intervention of interest) compared to prn IM pain medication (Comparison intervention) in controlling post operative pain (Outcome) during the perioperative and recovery time? Note: The IM pain medication would be called the control group. It would be unethical to have a control group that received NO pain medication. Many times the control group means they get “business as usual!” or the current standard of care.
3. Therapy PICOT Question, a non-intervention example:
What is the duration of recovery (O) for patients with total hip replacement (P) who developed a post-operative infection (I) as opposed to those who did not (C) within the first six weeks of recovery (T)?
4. Etiology PICOT Question:
Are kids (P) who have obese adoptive parents (I) at Increased risk for obesity (O) compared with kids (P) without obese adoptive parents (C) during the ages of five and 18 (T)?
5. Diagnostic PICOT Question:
Is a PKU test (I) done on two week old infants (P) more accurate in diagnosis inborn errors in metabolism (O) compared with PKU tests done at 24 hours of age (C)? Time is implied in two weeks and 24 hours old.
6. Prevention PICOT Question:
In OR nurses doing a five minute scrub (P) what are the differences in the presence and types of microbes (O) found on natural polished nails and nail beds (I) and artificial nails (C) at the time of surgery (T)?
7. Prognosis/Prediction PICOT question:
Does telelmonitoring blood pressure (I) in urban African Americans with hypertension (P) improve blood pressure control (O) within the six months of initiation of the medication (T)?
8. Meaning PICOT Question:
How do pregnant women (P) newly diagnosed with diabetes (I) perceive reporting their blood sugar levels (O) to their healthcare providers during their pregnancy and six weeks postpartum (T)?

How to Write a Research Proposal:
A Formal Template for Preparing a Proposal for Research Methods when social scientists desire to conduct an experiment, they first develop a proposal. A proposal introduces the problem, purpose, and significance of a study as well as the experimenter’s research question and hypothesis. It also gives a brief explanation of the theory guiding the study, a review of relevant literature pertaining to the theory, and the procedure for the experiment. The proposal should be written in American Psychological Association (APA) format. Without an elaborate Introduction, the experimenter will leave his or her readers wondering what exactly the purpose of the experiment is. The introduction explains in detail several components of the experiment that must be included in any proposal. After reading the Introduction, the reader should conclude why the experimenter is conducting the research and how this research will affect the academic community and society at large. For this paragraph in particular, it is sufficient to grab the reader’s attention, introduce the topic at hand, and provide a brief definition of the theory from which the study is based.
Statement of the Problem
The “Statement of the Problem” is an imperative part of the proposal, for in order for research to be conducted, one must notice a problem in the existing literature that has not been previously addressed. For this section, the following questions should be answered: Why does this research study need to be conducted? What specific issues does this study raise that have not been observed in other literature pertaining to the topic? Answering these questions will allow readers to understand why this particular study is important and how the study will attempt to answer new, never-before asked questions.

Purpose of the Study
It is appropriate include a sentence saying “The purpose of this study isвЂВ¦вЂќ under this section. Clearly identify the goal of the study in one precise sentence. For example, the sentence could look like this: “the purpose of this study is to determine whether the decision of first semester male students to live with or reject living with their roommates is related to whether their roommates affirm their self-views or not.” Why is this an important area of study? Answer this question under this section. Also, identify the unit of analysis or specific inquiry used.
Examples of different units of analysis include self-report surveys, observational studies, etc.
Research Question/Hypothesis
Research questions ask what relationships exist between the different variables in the study, while the hypothesis predicts the relationship between variables. List all the research questions in the study, and then include the researcher’s hypothesis for the study. Format this section as seen below.
For the purpose of this study, the following question were addressed:
1. List the research question here. For example, based on self-verification theory, will a
college student’s preference to stay with his roommate increase or decrease depending on
whether his roommate sees him as he sees himself?
As part of this study, investigation included one research hypothesis:
1. List the study’s hypothesis here: The more invested college students are in their self-views, the more they will express a desire to verify these self-views by preferring roommates who see them as they see themselves.
Definition of Terms
In experimental research, it is essential that one defines the central ideas or concepts of
the research study. Therefore, carefully define each concept/variable that will be used in the
study, citing other research studies as much as needed. List each term, italicize it, and use a
hyphen to define the term as seen below:
1. Target self-views—the target’s “thoughts and feelings about themselves that are derived
from past experiences, especially the reactions of others” (Swann & Read, 1981, p. 352).
2. Perceiver self-views—the perceiver’s “thoughts and feelings about themselves that are
derived from past experiences, especially the reactions of others” (Swann & Read, 1981,
p. 352).
Theoretical Framework
This section will detail the theory that is guiding the proposed study. From this theory, the researcher is able to inform the statement of the problem, the purpose of the study, the questions and hypothesis, the choice of instruments, and methodology of the study. In this section, explain the major tenants of the theory as well as how the theory relates to the proposed study. Remember that the eventual findings of the experiment will be discussed in terms of how they relate to the theory. It should be a brief explanation of the theory, as the details of particular experiments will be discussed later in the Literature Review.
Literature Review
The Literature Review provides the background for the research problem and illustrates
to the reader that the researcher is knowledgeable about the scope of the theory. Research as
many studies pertaining to the theory as possible, and summarize them in a succinct manner.
Review various dissertations, as they may help one to understand how to write and summarize
previous research. When writing the literature review, it is wise to separate the various studies
one finds into different categories. Under these categories, create “Level 2 subheadings” in APA
style. These subheadings are formatted just like Level 1 headings, but they are aligned left. See
the subheadings below for an example.
1st Subheading
Choose one evident theme or that became apparent when researching the theory. Briefly
share the results of the various studies, including the most pertinent information such as the
studies’ hypotheses, population, methodology, and results. Relate the study to an ongoing
dialogue of the literature pertaining to the research topic. This means that each study one lists
should relate to new, proposed study in some way. Report the studies sequentially if possible,
building upon the findings of prior studies. Remember to separate each category of studies with a
new subheading. Do this as many times as needed.
Methodology
The “Methodology” section is the most important section in the entire proposal, as it
explains each step the experimenter will take in order to conduct his or her research. This
section discusses what measures the researcher will take in order to test the study’s hypothesis.
In this section, it is vital to include the following subheadings while expanding on them in as
much detail as possible.
Research Design
Include the proposed research design of the study, whether it is a survey, experiment,
observation, secondary data of analysis, etc. Then, explain how this design will derive results.
Briefly discuss how the data will be administered and collected, including how the subjects will
participate in the study. Also, briefly discuss which theoretical model will guide this study and
what the model predicts will be the results of the study.
Sampling
This section should include an expanded discussion of the sample. First, discuss the
population under consideration. From where will participants be selected? Second, give the
sampling method to be used. Which specific sampling method will be used to select participants?
Lastly, list the elements that will be characteristic of the sample, such as sex, age, etc.
Instrumentation
In this paragraph, briefly outline the instruments that will be used in the study, including
any and all surveys, interviews, or observation grids. Discuss how the instrument(s) will measure
the study’s independent and dependent variables. Each instrument should be discussed below in
more detail under separate subheadings.
Instrument #1
List the first instrument that will be used in the study. Bold and indent the name of
instrument once to the right, as seen in the example above. For this paragraph in particular,
include why the instrument is considered to be valid and/or reliable as well as how it will be
useful for the proposed study. Repeat the same procedure for all other instruments.
Data Collection and Analysis Procedures
Explain the general plan for how the data will be collected, especially how the letter of
consent will be administered and collected. Include any survey, interview, or observation
procedures, and identify any incentives for students participating in the study. Also, include what
statistics or analytical tools will be used for analyzing the data, such as ANOVA, SPSS, or SAS
statistics, if applicable.
HOW TO WRITE A RESEARCH PROPOSAL 8
Protection of Human Rights
Discuss what efforts will be taken to protect human subjects. Reiterate that subjects’
participation is voluntary and that they can choose to withdraw from the study at any time.
Describe how the subjects’ confidentiality will be protected and how they may receive a copy of
the study when it is finished.
Discussion
This section is often labeled “Significance of the Study.” In formal proposals for graduate
study, the Discussion may be placed near the end of the Introduction. The Discussion focuses on
the implications of the proposed study, such as how the study’s results will affect future research,
theory, counseling, policy, etc. Therefore, write this section with the focus on how the study’s
results will benefit others. Identify any weaknesses to the proposed study and why they were not
addressed. Address how well the study will do in terms of internal and external validity, and
discuss the implications of the study affecting practice, policy, and scholarly/future research.
When the proposal is finished, be sure to include a reference list for all sources used at the end of
the proposal. See the APA Manual for formatting “Abstract” and “References” pages.
In the Discussion section, you will broadly evaluate your proposed experiment. What are
the strengths and limitations of your experiment? Are there other ways to test the same
hypothesis? What future experiments might be important? Are there any ethical concerns about your procedure? You should touch back on ideas that you mentioned in your introduction as

Conclusion
Prospective budget

References
Craig, S. A. (2003). The effects of an adapted interactive writing intervention on kindergarten children’s phonological awareness, spelling and early reading development. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 438-440.

Menzmer, S. J. (1993). Teaching print awareness through kindergarten journal writing. Journal of Adventist Education, Retrieved September 10, 2009, from /files/jae/en/jae199355050406.pdf

McKeown, M. G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, 55(1), 10-20.

Wohlwend, K. E. (2008). Kindergarten as nexus of practice: A mediated discourse analysis of reading, writing, play, and design in an early literacy apprenticeship. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(4), 332-334.

You need a minimum of 3 sources in ABC order and Hanging Indent.